Good Shepherd Health System Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752027157
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-T 2020
Location
Longview, TX, USA
Phone
9033155182
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Health Systems

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$3,441,270
Expenses
$2,620,342
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TODD HANCOCK (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JEFF PUCKETT (DIRECTOR): $9,079,910 total reported compensation
  • CHRIS GLENNEY (DIRECTOR): $1,510,736 total reported compensation
  • STEVEN KEUER MD (EX-OFFICIO DIRECTOR): $1,355,251 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support, benefit, respond, perform, and assist in enhancing healthcare services provided by entities controlled by gshs via ownership, membership, or influence over their management and policies.

What it reported doing in 2020

The system was originally organized in 1984 to serve as a parent holding company. The system is the sole corporate member of good shepherd-longview, marshall, and linden, gshs administrative services organization, inc. And gshs customer service building, llc, a Texas limited liability company. The system is the sole shareholder of gshs enterprises, inc. The system has an ownership interest in gshs home health, lp, a Texas limited partnership, gshs customer service building i, ltd. (building ltd) and champion e.m.s., (ems) a Texas nonprofit corporation, as well as several foundations and other non-for-profit and for-profit entities. The system is exempt from federal income taxation under section 501(a) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended (the code), by reason of being an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the code. The system and its affiliates have their primary operations in (i) longview, gregg county, Texas and (ii) marshall, harrison county, Texas. The system is the parent company for the health system, providing comprehensive health care delivery services through hospitals and other facilities within a large 11 county service area. Services of these facilities include acute medical care of all specialties including cardiology, orthopedics, neurosurgery, oncology, pediatrics, women's services and a range of outpatient medical care services. The medical center in longview is a level ii trauma center, a certified primary stroke center, and an accredited chest pain center. The system holds the majority of the investment assets and properties, including but not limited to numerous clinics, the institute for healthy living, land, and contains the legal and marketing departments for the health system. To meet the everyday healthcare needs of the residents in our region, good shepherd medical center operates family health centers in the communities of longview, gladewater, henderson, kilgore, jefferson, linden, and hughes springs. Through these medical offices, good shepherd provides a vital link to medical care. Recently adding urgent care services to kilgore, along with the implementation of orthodirect, has had a direct effect on the number of non-emergent cases and misuse of the emergency department. As part of our ongoing commitment to the underserved population of good shepherd's service area, the board of directors established criteria for financial assistance consistent with the organization's mission and financial resources. All entities provide financial assistance to all parties, without regard to race, creed, gender, or national origin, who are classified as financially indigent according to good shepherd's eligibility guidelines and who present themselves for care at good shepherd medical center and its regional system of services. Many factors such as all sources of income, employment status, family size, amount of patient's account and healthcare needs are all taken into consideration when determining eligibility for financial assistance. Good shepherd medical center maintains records to identify and monitor the level of financial assistance it provides to the communities it services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.4%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 58.8%; rating input score 59; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 23.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 168%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.4% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $9.1M · 24 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $8.7M reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 39 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 59/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.