Good Samaritan Hospice of Pittsburgh
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251818793
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Valencia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7249338888
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospices
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,335,502
- Expenses
- $11,956,135
- Assets
- $6,189,365
- Liabilities
- $1,397,788
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Keith Frndak - see Schedule O (Board Chair/President)
- Kristin Laboda (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Keith Frndak - see Schedule O (Board Chair/President): $905,273 total reported compensation
- Martin Trettel - see Schedule O (Board Member): $392,169 total reported compensation
- Tammy Young - see Schedule O (Board Member/Secretary): $274,253 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission is to establish and maintain programs which provide supportive care for terminally ill patients and their families; and to provide associated services including, but not limited to, operations of a non-profit hospice. The goal is to empower the community to understand the blessings of hospice and how the service can help those in an extremely difficult time in their lives.
What it reported doing in 2024
Good Samaritan Hospice (GSH) remains dedicated to excellent patient/family care, ethical practice in the management of funds and community activities contributing to improved education and understanding of quality of life at the end of life. The foundation of hospice is comfort care-managing pain and symptoms-to improve their overall quality of life while nearing the end of their journey. GSH provided care to 1,290 patients and their families in the community by providing 54,208 visits in their homes. Good Samaritan Hospice had 65 overall active volunteers. In addition, there are 3 volunteers who are active in the Angels on Call program for Good Samaritan Hospice. Angels on Call is a program which provides volunteers to sit with those patients at the End of Life. Volunteers offer anything from scripture to hymns, and simple companionship. The active volunteers participated in bereavement, clerical, patient service, inpatient unit support, and special events. Initial and ongoing training was provided to the volunteers who enrolled to be a part of this program. Other volunteers were able to offer help from home by making "memory quilts" for surviving family members out of personal clothing and fabric special to the deceased. We also experienced a great interest in the "Veteran's Blankets" which are given to those who serve in a branch of the military. The greatest volunteer requests we receive are from caregivers/family members trying to care for their loved ones at home. Caregivers may need to take a break to go to a doctor's appointment or get groceries. Some of our volunteers also visit or call family members at home after a patient passed away to comfort them in a time of bereavement. Hospice has several volunteers with certified pet therapy animals that visit families and offer emotional support. Volunteers also assist with office functions such as filing, organizing, creating admission packets, processing mail, creating thank you baskets for clinicians, and making condolence calls to those who have lost a loved one. Good Samaritan Hospice volunteers played a part in special events, meetings, and activities held throughout the year. Several of the special events included a volunteer recruitment day in Monroeville Community Park, where volunteer opportunities were discussed with 250 participants during a 4 hour event. Another recruitment event was held in Cranberry Township over the course of three days with over 5,000 participants. Education included on-site interviews for volunteers and opportunities offered by Good Samaritan Hospice. Other events included multiple youth bereavement events, memorial services, Holiday Grief Workshop, and a Memorial butterfly release. Over the course of the past fiscal year, Good Samaritan Hospice volunteers provided a total of 1,779 hours of service with a dollar value of $61,891 non-patient related volunteer hours totaled 115 hours of service. Free grief support groups were offered in Beaver, Butler and Allegheny County for those bereaved of our services and for those in the community. There were a total of 6 grief support sessions in all three communities which provided service to 16 participants. The Holiday Workshop was held on November 19, 2024 supported 20 participants. The Family Support Services Team offered over 95 hours of time to prepare, schedule and implement the event. Good Samaritan hosted two afternoon of remembrance memorial programs on April 26, 2025 at the Middlesex office location and May 31, 2025 at Concordia Villa St. Joseph chapel. Volunteers offered 56 hours of their time to prepare, plan and hold these events which served 17 family members. Hospice staff members provided education and information at no cost to over 1,837 individuals and their family members regarding their disease state, concerns, healthcare wishes and hospice and palliative care insurance options within the counties served, prior to their decision regarding care. It is estimated GSH tallied over 91
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 98% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most filed governance safeguards are in place. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 70
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.7%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 75.5%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 70.7%; rating input score 71; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 55.6%; rating input score 56; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.8%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.7% of revenue deployed · 75.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $905K · 16 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $369K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 22 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 56/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.