Rebecca Residence

What it reported doing in 2024

Rebecca Residence is licensed for 65 personal care beds. During the 2024 fiscal year, the facility averaged 57.7 residents per day in personal care translating to a total of 21,052 days of care provided. Residents of personal care are cared for by licensed practical nurses (LPNs) and nursing assistants. In addition to LPNs and nursing assistants. Care plans are developed by inter-disciplinary teams in personal care that outline the care that is to be provided to the residents. It is the goal of the facility to serve residents in the least restrictive environment - personal care as opposed to skilled nursing and discharged home as opposed to serving residents in the facility. Residents receive assistance with daily activities, three chef-inspired meals every day, regular housekeeping and laundry services. The facility employs its own therapy staff that provides services to residents, enabling them to get back to their highest possible level of functionality. A robust activities program is provided to create a stimulating environment. Examples of activities programs provided to the residents include, but are not limited to, musical entertainment, daily exercise classes, current events updates, Bible studies, church services, holiday parties, summer picnics, and day trips outside of the facility. Benevolent care is also a core tenant of the mission of Rebecca Residence. With the focus on charity care being so important, the facility provided 2,372 subsidized days of care during the year to residents who were unable to pay for the full cost of their care due to lack of resources. This averages 6.5 residents per day and totaled $242,357 worth of subsidies. This is funded partly by donations from the Rebecca Residence Foundation.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 71%; rating input score 71
• Program expense ratio: 86%; rating input score 86
• Fundraising efficiency: $68.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
  • Compensation committee: Missing
  • Independent consultant: Missing
  • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
  • Written employment contract: Missing
  • Compensation survey or study: Missing
  • Board or committee approval: Missing
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: 99%; rating input score 99; 31st percentile among comparable filings
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 45.5%; rating input score 45; 8th percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Pass
  • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 21%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.93; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 4.7%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings