Gold Cross Ambulance Service
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411917516
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Rochester, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5075381297
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,251,593
- Expenses
- $44,394,870
- Assets
- $24,041,443
- Liabilities
- $8,438,555
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SEINOLA SCOTT A (DIRECTOR / PRESIDENT / CEO)
- ANDERSON PAUL D (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ZIETLOW MD SCOTT P (DIRECTOR): $561,035 total reported compensation
- SANTRACH MD PAULA J (DIRECTOR / VICE CHAIR): $470,797 total reported compensation
- SMOLDT CRAIG A (DIRECTOR / CHAIR): $461,693 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide superior patient care, at a reasonable cost in a way that engages the whole team, working together in clinical practice, education and research.
What it reported doing in 2014
Education and training - see schedule o: education and training: gold cross has been designated by the american heart association (aha) as a community training center (ctc) for the aha which has established gold cross as a provider of emergency cardiac care training at various professional levels for the aha. Gold cross provides customized educational and training programs to the public, mayo clinic, mayo foundation for medical education and research, other allied health care agencies, and public safety agencies covering topics such as basic emergency care, medical-legal issues, osha requirements, environmental emergencies and other courses specific to customer needs. Throughout 2014 over 10,000 people were trained through the ctc operated by gold cross.gold cross donates training time to a variety of cities, counties, fire departments, emergency medical service agencies, as well as the general public. Gold cross has demonstrated this commitment by supporting various associations including the southeast regional ems program board, the arrowhead ems association, the central Minnesota ems joint powers board, the south central ems board, the mn ems regulatory board, the mn ems regulatory board data collection subcommittee, the mn ems regulatory board prehospital education advisory committee, the mn ems regulatory board mental health transfer task force, the rochester/olmsted county integrated emergency management system disaster exercise subcommittee, the lakehead (Minnesota) and vacationland (Wisconsin) mutual aid associations, the american heart association, the Minnesota ambulance association, and the southeast regional ems prehospital advisory committee. Approximately 8,300 hours of employee time was provided for a variety of safety-related programs to various communities, businesses, and schools. In addition, gold cross ambulance service employees participated in a large number of community events, school career fairs, student tours, brownie troops, cub scouts, boy scouts, student mentorship programs, various parades, head start events and health fairs, among others. The estimated dollar value of these efforts and other donated services exceeded $414,000. In addition gold cross has established a 2-year paramedic training program in conjunction with a local community college and the mayo school of health sciences. The investment made in the program helps secure a well-trained workforce for gold cross and other ambulance providers that depend on a continuous flow of new, well-qualified and capable paramedics into the workforce. Many local communities cannot upgrade their ambulance service from basic (bls) to advanced (als) because volunteers do not have accessible training. Inspired by this fact, gold cross has worked with a multitude of community partners to develop innovative training solutions. Similarly, volunteer community groups specializing in first response or disaster response often lack finances to make initial purchases of equipment or to upgrade equipment. Gold cross donates used equipment to such organizations regularly. The total value of donated equipment, including vehicles in 2014 was approximately $71,500. Gold cross further supports various communities by contracting with them to provide management support services for their services.over the years, gold cross has developed cooperative approaches in meeting medical center staffing needs as well as increasing training for gold cross paramedics. By collaborating with hospitals in various cities in which we provide service, gold cross paramedics provide advanced level patient care in the emergency room environment in communities that benefit from that staffing. Through this collaborative effort, gold cross paramedics receive training and experience to further enhance their skills and the hospital and medical center benefit from the availability of paramedics to assist during periods of time when they experience shortages in staffing.gold cross is a founding mem
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.8%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 84.2%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.8% of revenue deployed · 84.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $37.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $561K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $1.8M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 68 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.