Global Links
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521629060
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4123613424
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,036,216
- Expenses
- $6,951,549
- Assets
- $5,917,515
- Liabilities
- $756,923
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANGELA GARCIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANGELA GARCIA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $160,875 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Global links is dedicated to improving health in communities with need locally and globally. We build partnerships with healthcare providers and share medical surplus to improve access to essential care.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our domestic programs include: 1. Our community partners program ensures that people in western Pennsylvania have access to basic health and hygiene materials via our nonprofit partners. These medical and personal hygiene supplies are not available to people due to gaps in insurance coverage, affordability of co-pays, or lack of coverage by other assistance programs. We support initiatives related to basic needs, healthy aging, respiratory health, maternal and infant health, and community health. 2. Our community engagement and volunteer program provides a supportive and educational environment where hands-on service has a profound impact on the lives of those in need. People of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities sort and prepare the medical materials used in our programs, turning our region's surplus into life-saving and life-improving donations. 3. Our medical surplus recovery program provides healthcare organizations, universities and the public with a responsible alternative to discarding surplus medical supplies and furnishings, rescuing an average of 250 tons of high-quality surplus materials in a typical year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 77% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.4 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 93.6%; rating input score 94; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.2%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.6% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $161K · 17 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 21 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.