East Liberty Family Health Care Center
Legal name: East Liberty Family Health Care Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251417228
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4126612802
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,380,229
- Expenses
- $14,637,135
- Assets
- $11,677,743
- Liabilities
- $6,864,561
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ARSENIAL RUNION (CHIEF EXECTUTIVE OFFICER): $225,000 total reported compensation
- DAVID HALL MD (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $206,000 total reported compensation
- BRIAN J KING (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $140,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
East Liberty Family Health Care Center (ELFHCC) provides whole-person primary health care—physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being—for uninsured, underinsured, and underserved people (with a faith-based, Christ-centered approach). East Liberty Family Health Care Center is proud to be a member of the Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers (PACHC). PACHC** is a statewide membership services organization representing Community Health Centers—the largest primary care network in Pennsylvania and the nation—and other primary healthcare safety net providers. PACHC providers care for more than 700,000 Pennsylvanians through more than 300 nonprofit health centers that provide comprehensive primary medical, dental and behavioral health services throughout sites in rural and urban communities across Pennsylvania. Community Health Centers share the mission of improving access...
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization provided in-home services to home bound elderly, including home visits by physicians and nurses. The goal of this program is to provide care to home bound elderly who are unable to come into the office and to allow these people to age with dignity in their own homes for as long as possible. We went to local homeless shelters, soup kitchens, and drop-in centers to form relationships with the homeless, and when trust developed, invited them into care at our offices.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 62% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 65.3%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 68.6%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $12.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 65.3% of revenue deployed · 68.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $225K · 18 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $288K reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.