General Baptist Healthcare

Legal name: General Baptist Nursing Home of Illinois Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
371104153
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2012
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Farmington, MO, US
Phone
6182634337
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Homeowners & Tenants Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,068,902
Expenses
$6,686,726
Assets
$7,342,817
Liabilities
$11,056,546

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization realizes a moral responsibility for the residents in the facility and the administration is committed to ensuring that each resident receives good quality care. The specific personalized needs of the residents include the physical, social, spiritual, psychological and safety aspects which we strive daily to satisfy.

What it reported doing in 2012

A skilled nursing and supportive living facility. The nursing facility provides quality nursing care for up to 90 residents including alzheimer and related disorders. 24-hour access to nursing staff that includes a director of nurses, assistant director of nurses, rns, lpns and aides. Physicians are on call 24-hours a day and consultants are available in the areas of dietary, pharmacy, laboratory, medical director, dental and rehabilitation therapy. In addition, nutritionally balanced meals, planned by a registered dietician, are provided as well as housekeeping and laundry services and numerous social activities. The supportive living facility provides a range of services that promote quality of life and independence for up to 38 residents. Services include 24-hour supervision, prepared meals and personal services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.1; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.51; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $139K · 11 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2012
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.