Geisinger

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232967235
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Danville, PA, USA
Phone
5702716624
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$41,846,569
Expenses
$45,837,052
Assets
$25,634,390
Liabilities
$23,193,522

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • KEVIN V ROBERTS MBA CPA (EVP, CFO, TREASURER): $2,751,325 total reported compensation
  • JANET F TOMCAVAGE RN MSN (PRES, CHAIR, DIRECTOR): $1,771,895 total reported compensation
  • STEVEN B BENDER ESQUIRE (CLO, SECRETARY): $1,150,182 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide high-quality, compassionate healthcare services to the communities we serve.

What it reported doing in 2024

I. General program service information geisinger community health services (gchs) was established in july 1998 as a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit corporation. Gchs operates geisinger's life program. Gchs strives to provide clinical excellence, advocacy, and innovative solutions to enhance the health and independence of all its community members. Gchs provides quality medical healthcare regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, or handicap. Life geisinger (living independently for elders) provides additional independence for older individuals and their caregivers. Life geisinger is a coordinated, comprehensive model of care which provides services that help older adults maintain their quality of life and independence while living at home. These services include primary care, transportation, in-home care, therapy and other services. Life geisinger is recognized by the state of Pennsylvania and the centers for medicare and medicaid services as a pace provider. Pace means programs for all-inclusive care of the elderly - those that offer older adults a variety of services designed to maintain health, prevent nursing home placement, and improve the quality of life. Funding for the life program is received from medicare, medicaid and/or private monies. To qualify to become a life geisinger participant, individuals must: -be 55 years of age or older -meet eligibility criteria for nursing facility level of care -live in one of the following counties: columbia, juniata, lackawanna, luzerne, mifflin, montour, northumberland, schuylkill, or snyder -be able to live safely within the community with services provided by life geisinger -financial eligibility is based on current medical assistance criteria or the ability to pay privately the program operates four full life centers located in scranton, lewistown, kulpmont, wilkes-barre, and minersville. Total program member months for 2024 were 5,087 for an average census of 424 program participants. Ii. Uncompensated care gchs recognizes that its mission is to serve all the members of the community with respect to the provision of healthcare services and healthcare education. Gchs provides quality medical healthcare regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age or ability to pay. In this regard, gchs provides free care or subsidized care, to persons covered by governmental programs at or below cost and provides various health activities and programs in support of the communities where gchs practices. A. Medicare/medicaid in recognizing its mission to the community, gchs provides care, below cost, to persons covered by governmental programs. To the extent reimbursement is below the cost of providing healthcare, gchs is furthering its mission to the community. The unreimbursed value of medicare and/or medicaid is equal to the cost of providing services less the amount received as reimbursement under the program. The unreimbursed value of providing care to these patients was $4,412,454 during the year ended december 31, 2024. V. Community benefit summary medicare/medicaid shortfall $4,412,454

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 42
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 99.2%; rating input score 99
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.5%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.9; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.8%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $45.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $2.8M · 12 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $674K reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 76 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.