Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine
Legal name: Geisinger Commonwealth Sch of Med
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260812968
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Danville, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5702716624
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Graduate, Professional Schools (Separate Entities)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,679,675
- Expenses
- $49,947,619
- Assets
- $238,750,160
- Liabilities
- $81,335,926
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIE BYERLEY MD MPH (PRESIDENT, DEAN, DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JAEWON RYU MD JD (DIRECTOR): $14,295,895 total reported compensation
- TERRY GILLILAND MD (DIRECTOR): $3,217,500 total reported compensation
- KEVIN V ROBERTS MBA CPA (EVP, CFO, TREASURER): $2,751,325 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine educates aspiring physicians and scientists to serve society using a community-based, patient-centered, interprofessional and evidence-based model of education that is committed to fairness and respect for all, promotes discovery and employs innovative techniques.
What it reported doing in 2024
Academic program: geisinger commonwealth school of medicine (gcsom) offers three separate degree programs: a doctor of medicine (md) program, master of biomedical science (mbs) program and an associates degree in nursing (adn). Gcsom focuses biomedical research and training programs on health issues prevalent in northeastern and north central Pennsylvania, a 17-county region with 1.8 million residents. The region has an aging population, 19.5 percent of residents are older than age 65, compared to 15.1 percent nationally. Moreover, the region has high incidences of breast, lung, colorectal and prostate cancers, as well as high incidences of non-hodgkin's lymphoma, other chronic disease associated with aging, and significant needs in primary care, mental/behavioral health, and community medicine. The school of medicine's total health curriculum (thc), is a four-year, three-phase curriculum that matriculates 115 medical students per class. The first phase is a novel active learning-based, integrated curriculum that uses the clinical presentation model, within organ system-based blocks. In this phase, students also gain early clinical experience in the longitudinal clinical experience where students work in local primary care clinics. During the second phase of the curriculum, students are assigned to one of gcsom's regional campuses, where they will train in acute care hospitals and ambulatory practice sites. The five gcsom regional campuses are the northeast (scranton/wilkes-barre), central (danville), west (lewistown/state college) guthrie (sayre), and atlanticare (atlantic city, nj). The third phase of the curriculum provides students with opportunities to explore different career pathways and complete required and elective coursework aligned with their postgraduate specialty of choice. The thc also includes the systems, society, and humanism in medicine curriculum (sshm) composed of six longitudinal themes that are integrated throughout the curriculum and transform our socially responsible students into socially accountable leaders in the healthcare system and their communities. Sshm fosters the development of compassionate and adaptable physicians dedicated to a person-centered approach to improving the health and well-being of the patients and communities they serve. Sshm incorporates a family centered and community experience (fcce). The fcce matches students with families living with chronic illnesses, disabilities or whose lived experience impacts their health. This allows our community members to be our students' educators, and for students to listen and learn from people with lived experiences that have impacted their health or the health of the community. Students also participate in a required longitudinal community health/ service-learning program, to investigate and/or solve a community health issue, to make an immediate improvement in the community and to enhance the health of the region's citizens. In addition to required coursework, md candidates also participate in community service activities with community agencies. The students organize blood drives and health fairs, tutor local children, collect food and warm clothing for the homeless and complete many other helpful acts that immerse them in and improve the well-being of the community. In total, gcsom students have volunteered more than 50,000 hours to the community since the school's inception. Since 2020, the abigail geisinger scholars programs (ags) has provided tuition and fee support and a cost-of-living stipend for up to 45 incoming students annually in exchange for a service commitment within the geisinger health system after residency. The goal of this program is to reduce student debt and importantly, repopulate regional physician shortages in key specialty areas including family medicine, internal medicine, medical pediatrics, and psychology. In the 2024 md match, 115 students were placed into residency programs, 52 students are entering primary
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 75% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some related-organization disclosures are missing and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 83
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.1%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 88%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 71.4%; rating input score 71; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.78; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.1%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 91.1% of revenue deployed · 88% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 7 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $44M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $14.3M · 21 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.4M reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 76 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.