Gay and Lesbian Fund for Dallas
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752965582
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2144218177
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $149,656
- Expenses
- $3,067
- Assets
- $159,013
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ENRIQUE MACGREGOR (PRESIDENT)
- MARK NIERMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ENRIQUE MACGREGOR (PRESIDENT)
- MARK NIERMAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JEREMY WATKINS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote equality and inclusion, and raise awareness of the contributions of the lgbtq+ community by granting money to other dallas-area nonprofit organizations.
What it reported doing in 2025
2025's largest event was "flutter & fizz," a fundraising and community engagement event supporting glfd's charitable grantmaking mission. The event engaged up to 350 attendees and raised funds through sponsorships and ticket sales. The funds raised from this event are intended to support a future charitable grant related to the dallas zoo's capital campaign, expected to be paid in the 2026 fiscal year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 20
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 93
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.1%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 52.5%; rating input score 52
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 98%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 51.85; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.5% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.1% of revenue deployed · 52.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.