Shared Housing Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752137522
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2148218510
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,396,129
- Expenses
- $1,628,373
- Assets
- $4,599,507
- Liabilities
- $78,079
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT EVANS (PRESIDENT)
- ANGELA MARTIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- NISHANTH VITTAL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHELLE STRAUGHN-HARVEY (PAST PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARIA MACHADO (EXECUTIVE): $70,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We offer housing solutions with supportive services, focusing on economic independence, vocational advancement and academic achievement.
What it reported doing in 2024
The green haus on the santa fe trail is our newest housing solution - located on 1 acre of land in old east dallas. Designed as mixed, emergency (90 day) transitional (12 months) and semi-permanent (18-24 months) housing, this community offers a total of 24 housing units to homeless women and children, as described above. We offer case management and housing stability planning. Through our partners, we offer financial/budget classes, mental health counseling, and employment-related opportunities, including resumes, online applications, and career planning. We also offer children's educational and recreational activities. Clients have access to the food pantry and essentials, including toiletries and hygiene items.we assisted 22 families (22 adults and 59 children).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 76% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $47.69 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.82; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $70K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.