Gastineau Human Services
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920065232
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Juneau, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9077804338
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,859,602
- Expenses
- $7,688,787
- Assets
- $11,216,383
- Liabilities
- $2,569,753
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- JONATHAN SWINTON (EXECUTIVE DI): $246,662 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL HELMS JR (REENTRY SERV): $185,438 total reported compensation
- BRIE KAUZLARICH (FINANCE/ADMI): $178,870 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mission: helping people rebuild their lives. Vision: strengthening our community one life at a time. Core values: respect, integrity, fairness, collaboration, compassion.
What it reported doing in 2024
The behavioral health treatment program provides addiction treatment services for adults in inpatient and outpatient settings. This program provides biopsychosocial assessments, individual counseling, group counseling, family counseling, skill building, and case management services for persons diagnosed with substance use disorders. Recovery house - this residential treatment program provides low-intensity substance abuse treatment. The residential program provides skill-building services, access and facilitation to 12-step and other recovery groups, case management services, individual counseling, and family counseling for persons who need structure to maintain sobriety. For residents who require additional treatment services, they are provided through our behavioral health outpatient department. During the past year, we served 72 residents in an inpatient setting. The goal of this program is to give persons treatment and support while residing in safe/sober housing. This affords them the opportunity to work, save money, repair relationships, and work toward independence. The goal is for persons to become functional, employed, reunite with their families, and repay monies owed. During the past year, this program served 207 individuals in an outpatient setting.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.8%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 96.3%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.2%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.8% of revenue deployed · 96.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $247K · 11 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.