Juneau Cooperative Christian Ministry

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920085663
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2018
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Juneau, AK, USA
Phone
9075864159
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Homeless Shelters
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,261,466
Expenses
$1,303,389
Assets
$1,289,594
Liabilities
$42,756

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARLA BERG (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • BRUCE DENTON (BOARD VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARIYA LOVISHCHUK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARIYA LOVISHCHUK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $85,819 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the glory hall is to provide food, shelter, and compassion to those most in need in order to help them achieve physical and spiritual well being.

What it reported doing in 2018

Juneau cooperative christian ministry (glory hall) has one key function, which is to provide food, shelter, and other assistance to those in need. In 2017 the following services were provided1) 12,760 bed nights to men, women and children in need of emergency shelter. The bed nights included showers, laundry services, and other essential supplies, such as toiletries, and hygiene related products.2) 51,530 meals were provided to men, women, and children in need. We also provided food boxes to everyone who requested food boxes, both throughout the year and during thanksgiving and christmas holidays.3) many other services including laundry (5,000 loads), showers (3,171 showers), limited case management, clothing assistance, utility assistance, homelessness prevention assistance, prescription medication assistance, transportation assistance, job and housing search assistance and outreach were provided.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.8%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 95.6%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: $96.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: 98.8% of revenue deployed · 95.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $86K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2011 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.