Garden Village

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
912090034
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Yakima, WA, USA
Phone
5094534854
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,423,849
Expenses
$13,923,275
Assets
$4,897,410
Liabilities
$3,150,158

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Shawnie Haas (President)
  • Edie Dibble (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jane Stilwell JAN-MAY (Administrator): $155,876 total reported compensation
  • Amanda Garrison (Office Manager): $138,954 total reported compensation
  • Barbara Jean Monjaraz (RN): $128,897 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We help people with complex mental health problems successfully live in our community. We value lives, accept and support individuals through integrated behavioral and medical healthcare in a skilled nursing facility. Garden Village offers a community behavioral/medical alternative for residents when faced with their only other option in an acute-care-psychiatric hospital that is located 200 miles away.We also provide social support for individuals with advanced dementia or unstable mental illness as well as medical healthcare needs. all of these residents require a secure setting due to impaired cognitive functioning. We help people with complex mental health problems successfully live in our community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Founded in 2000, Garden Village provides a coordinated program that includes in-house behavioral treatment and medical, skilled nursing care and social services. All of these clinical care services are provided in a home-style, resident centered care environment that allows residents and their families to enjoy a quality of life focused on normal daily routines and comforts. Whether their needs are for short-term crisis stabilization and rehabilitation, or for longer-term residence and palliative care, each resident receives an individualized program that meets his or her unique needs.Garden Village has been recognized in the industry for their special programs for older adults and are a prior recipient of the National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare Award of Excellence.Their staff has been through specialized training using the Mandt Program, and includes a medical director who is a Board Certified Geriatric Family Medicine Specialist and on site mental health professionals. The facility has effectively been able to help protect those with diminished capacity to understand and/or protect themselves from hazards. Since its inception, records show decreased admissions to the state hospital and local hospital psychiatric unit and decreased mental health Crisis Outreach Team contacts with elders in the community.Garden Village served a total of 193 individuals in 2024 for a total of 31,649 resident census days. Serving 27,414 Medicaid resident census days including 8,286 expanded Behavioral Health service days.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.2%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -12.1%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.2% of revenue deployed · 85.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 2 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $156K · 12 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.