Childrens Village
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352654720
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Yakima, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5095743200
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,740
- Expenses
- $9,089
- Assets
- $23,080
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIN BLACK (PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD)
- LAURA CROOKS (CEO)
People named in this filing
- ERIN BLACK (PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD)
- TAMMY BUYOK (SECRETARY OF THE BOARD)
- CHRISTY BRACEWELL-TROTTER (TREASURER OF THE BOARD)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Coordination and collaboration to provide specialty medical, dental, therapy and behavioral health services to children with special healthcare needs and their families in the yakima region of eastern wa.
What it reported doing in 2024
Collaborative coordination of specialty medical, behavioral health, dental, and developmental services forchildren with special healthcare needs for three trusteeorganizations, serving 10,000 children and providing over 43,000 visits on an annual basis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 40%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.54; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 69% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 56.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 61.3% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 40% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.