Fsl Programs

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860411904
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6022851800
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,417,668
Expenses
$9,942,463
Assets
$7,480,117
Liabilities
$4,273,042

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TAMARA BOHANNON (CEO & PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • TAMARA BOHANNON (CEO & PRESIDENT): $248,447 total reported compensation
  • DAVID PADDISON (CFO & TREASURER): $216,218 total reported compensation
  • STEVE HASTINGS (CHIEF OF REAL ESTATE & VIC): $205,224 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely and with peace of mind.

What it reported doing in 2024

Through its affiliates, foundation for senior living (fsl) has been making Arizona a safe place to age since 1974. Fsl underwent a rebrand in april 2025 and is doing business as allthrive365. Allthrive365 assists over 38,000 arizonans annually through more than 25 programs centered around three primary focus areas: health, housing and connection. In the fiscal year 2024-25, allthrive365 continued its commitment to providing secure housing by offering shelter to over 1,300 arizonans each night. This encompassed various housing options, including single- and multi-family homes, affordable housing complexes, and residential behavioral health group homes. (continued on schedule o)allthrive365 also actively trained and monitored sponsors involved in adult foster care and adult behavioral health therapeutic home programs.as the largest provider of weatherization services in Arizona, allthrive365's weatherization and home improvement initiatives cut energy bills and improved health for over 8,000 homeowners. In the area of nutrition, allthrive365 provided 200,000 meals to families in need via food pantries, congregate and home-delivered meal programs. Health and wellness initiatives provided transitional care for over 2,400 patients upon hospital discharge and operated adult day health facilities, delivering over 133,000 hours of respite care to family caregivers. Throughout the fiscal year 2024-25, allthrive365 remained steadfast in its mission, making significant strides in ensuring the safety, health, and well-being of arizonans of all ages.in 1975, allthrive365 opened the first adult day health services (adhs) center in Arizona to provide a safe, supportive and caring environment for seniors and adults with disabilities. Allthrive365 now operates two centers in glendale and tempe which are all licensed by the Arizona department of health services. Clients benefit from nursing services, personal care assistance and social service connections, all of which help them maintain their individual level of independence. 133,923 hours of care were provided to 263 clients in fye 2025. Along with providing supervision, allthrive365's dedicated staff create monthly therapeutic recreation calendars offering activities to meet the needs of allthrive365's clients' various cognitive and physical abilities. In addition to daily exercise programs, educational offerings and community outings, 162,284 miles of transportation and 16,900 nutritious meals were provided to clients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 69% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 96.7%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 96.7% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $248K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 58 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.