Fsl Home Improvements

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383649930
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6022851800
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,873,613
Expenses
$16,405,219
Assets
$6,509,103
Liabilities
$3,750,927

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TAMARA BOHANNON (CEO & PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • TAMARA BOHANNON (CEO & PRESIDENT): $248,447 total reported compensation
  • DAVID PADDISON (CFO & TREASURER): $216,218 total reported compensation
  • STEVE HASTINGS (CHIEF OF REAL ESTATE & VIC): $205,224 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age indpendently, safely and with peace of mind.

What it reported doing in 2024

Through its affiliates, foundation for senior living (fsl) has been making Arizona a safe place to age since 1974. Fsl underwent a rebrand in april 2025 and is doing business as allthrive365. Allthive365 assists over 38,000 arizonans annually through more than 25 programs centered around three primary focus areas: health, housing and connection. In the fiscal year 2024-25, allthive365 continued its commitment to providing secure housing by offering shelter to over 1,300 arizonans each night. This encompassed various housing options, including single- and multi-family homes, affordable housing complexes, and residential behavioral health group homes. (continued on schedule o)allthive365 also actively trained and monitored sponsors involved in adult foster care and adult behavioral health therapeutic home programs.as the largest provider of weatherization services in Arizona, allthrive365's weatherization and home improvement initiatives cut energy bills and improved health for over 8,000 homeowners. In the area of nutrition, allthrive365 provided 200,000 meals to families in need via food pantries, congregate and home-delivered meal programs. Health and wellness initiatives provided transitional care for over 2,400 patients upon hospital discharge and operated adult day health facilities, delivering over 133,000 hours of respite care to family caregivers. Throughout the fiscal year 2024-25, allthrive365 remained steadfast in its mission, making significant strides in ensuring the safety, health, and well-being of arizonans of all ages.since 2002, fsl home improvements dba allthrive365 hi has been providing emergency, minor and major repairs, renovations and energy conservation services to low-income households throughout maricopa county. In fye 2025, fsl home improvements dba allthrive365 hi served 458 households. As the Arizona sponsor of the home performance with energystar program we reported 7,500 energy audits to the environmental protection agency. Fsl home improvements dba allthrive365 hi continues to provide rehab and emergency repair services for the city of tolleson, city of goodyear and city of chandler. Through funding from aps and srp for our healthy homes a/c program, fsl home improvements dba allthrive365 hi served 47 households. The a/c program truly has saved lives and improved the health of the household members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.8%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $14.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $248K · 4 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $11.9M reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 58 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.