Fsl Management
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860462786
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6022851800
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing Development, Construction, Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,102,631
- Expenses
- $4,713,209
- Assets
- $2,470,745
- Liabilities
- $5,881,529
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TAMARA BOHANNON (CEO & PRESIDENT)
- CHARNISE MOORE (CPO & VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- TAMARA BOHANNON (CEO & PRESIDENT): $248,447 total reported compensation
- DAVID PADDISON (CFO & TREASURER): $216,218 total reported compensation
- STEVE HASTINGS (CHIEF OF REAL ESTATE AND SECRETARY): $205,224 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our holistic approach prepares and embraces individuals to age independently, safely, and with peace of mind.
What it reported doing in 2024
Through its affiliates, foundation for senior living (fsl) has been making Arizona a safe place to age since 1974. Fsl underwent a rebrand in april 2025 and is doing business as allthrive365. Allthrive365 assists over 38,000 arizonans annually through more than 25 programs centered around three primary focus areas: health, housing and connection. In the fiscal year 2024-25, allthrive365 continued its commitment to providing secure housing by offering shelter to over 1,300 arizonans each night. This encompassed various housing options, including single- and multi-family homes, affordable housing complexes, and residential behavioral health group homes. (continued on schedule o)allthrive365 also actively trained and monitored sponsors involved in adult foster care and adult behavioral health therapeutic home programs. As the largest provider of weatherization services in Arizona, allthrive365's weatherization and home improvement initiatives cut energy bills and improved health for over 8,000 homeowners. In the area of nutrition, allthrive365 provided 200,000 meals to families in need via food pantries, congregate and home-delivered meal programs. Health and wellness initiatives provided transitional care for over 2,400 patients upon hospital discharge and operated adult day health facilities, delivering over 133,000 hours of respite care to family caregivers. Throughout the fiscal year 2024-25, allthrive365 remained steadfast in its mission, making significant strides in ensuring the safety, health, and well-being of arizonans of all ages.we were overwhelmed with support from our community partners, including the roman catholic diocese of phoenix, area agency on aging, maricopa county, Virginia g. Piper charitable trust, Arizona public service, the diane and bruce halle foundation, wellik foundation, and banner health foundation. We continued to engage our customers in a feedback loop called listen for good and maintained a high net promotor score of 72+. We used this valuable tool to survey employees, receiving valuable feedback from our team throughout the organization. We maintained an operating budget of $46m for the year. Our resource navigation and community action teams provided an overwhelming amount of rental, mortgage, and utility assistance to help people remain in their homes. In october of 2024, allthrive365 hosted its 50th anniversary celebration, honoring 50 changemakers over the age of 50. Additionally, we launched our rebrand publicly on april 21, 2025 which was received with overwhelming positivity and support by the community. Finally, we remained in the 5th position on the phoenix business journal's healthcare book of lists.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 37
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.37 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.38; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $248K · 6 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $538K reported
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 58 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.