Foundation of Yuma Regional Medical Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510179146
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Yuma, AZ, USA
Phone
9283367045
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,623,980
Expenses
$1,299,031
Assets
$25,849,941
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT J TRENSCHEL DO MPH (PRESIDENT/CEO YRMC/TRUSTEE)
  • MACHELE HEADINGTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • RUSSELL WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBERT J TRENSCHEL DO MPH (PRESIDENT/CEO YRMC/TRUSTEE): $2,671,867 total reported compensation
  • ROBERT TAKESUYE DO (TRUSTEE, PHYSICIAN/YRMC): $1,484,395 total reported compensation
  • VERNON MOORE (SVP/CFO YMRC/TRUSTEE): $899,431 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the foundation of yuma regional medical center is to support a healthy community through philanthropy.

What it reported doing in 2024

The medical education & scholarships fund is dedicated to nurturing the next generation of healthcare professionals. By providing financial assistance to promising students and staff, we hope to cultivate a robust healthcare career pipeline. In addition, we aim to assist students in overcoming financial barriers and improve their access quality education. This year the foundation distributed 34 scholarships totaling $77,000 in awards.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 89% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 75
  • Accountability: 75
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.6%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 60.7%; rating input score 61
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.17 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 73.3%; rating input score 73; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 50.5%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.9; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 74.5%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.6% of revenue deployed · 60.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $788K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $2.7M · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.