Five Strong Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
811092210
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Columbus, OH, USA
Phone
6143609043
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$-151
Expenses
$12,335
Assets
$29,647

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CALEB STRUEWING (PRESIDENT/TR)

People named in this filing

  • BRETT HATCHER (BOARD MEMBER)
  • CHRISTOPHER CJ JACKSON (BOARD MEMBER)
  • CALEB STRUEWING (PRESIDENT/TR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of five strong foundation is engaging in charitable, educational, and scientific activities within the meaning of section 501 (c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986. The corporation provides humanitarian assistance to the distressed and underprivileged. The corporation assists, encourages, and promotes the well being of mankind and primarily the inhabitants of the community of columbus Ohio, including those living with developmental disabilities.

What it reported doing in 2024

To promote, assist, encourage, the well being of mankind and primarily the inhabitants of the community of columbus Ohio.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 50.7%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -8,268.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.4; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -30% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -28.7% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.