Fbi-leeda Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 363885342
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Malvern, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8777727712
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Crime Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,146,262
- Expenses
- $10,472,610
- Assets
- $13,882,696
- Liabilities
- $1,316,893
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOEL FITZGERALD SR (PRESIDENT)
- LON THIELE (1ST VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTOPHER WORKMAN (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- TORRIE JAMES (3RD VICE PRESIDENT)
- JACQUES BATTISTE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JACQUES BATTISTE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $176,880 total reported compensation
- MICHAEL ROBINSON (CHIEF OPERATION OFFICER): $169,533 total reported compensation
- LYNN WEBER (FINANCE MANAGER): $164,162 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance the science and art of law enforcement leadership and promote the exchange of information to improve law enforcement management practices through training, education, and networking among police professionals across the united states and beyond.
What it reported doing in 2024
Fbi-leeda held 566 in person classes and 28 online classes, educating a total of 18,349 students teaching in 48 states. It successfully held its annual national conference in san antonio, tx providing valuable networking and education to law enforcement professionals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.9%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.9% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $177K · 9 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.