Lambeth House
Legal name: Episcopal Housing for Seniors Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721140753
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2016
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- New Orleans, LA, United States
- Phone
- (504) 865-1960
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $277,989
- Expenses
- $5,928,378
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GEORGE YOUNG (PRESIDENT)
- JANICE PARMELEE (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- SCOTT CRABTREE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT CRABTREE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $269,216 total reported compensation
- JANICE J HALES (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $151,689 total reported compensation
- LYNN SWETLAND (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $134,524 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support a continuing care retirement community for the aged in New Orleans, Louisiana. At Lambeth House, we offer a continuum of senior care services designed to meet the unique needs of each resident, from Assisted Living to 24-hour Nursing Care with Memory Support services at Saint Anna’s at Lambeth House. Our senior supportive care services in New Orleans provide peace of mind, knowing that exceptional care is available right here, whenever it’s needed. Whether you’re seeking immediate or long-term support, you can transition directly into the level of care that best suits your needs, without the hassle of moving through other areas of the community. Comprehensive Senior Care Options.
What it reported doing in 2016
Housing for the elderly - episcopal housing for seniors, inc. Subsidizes the chaplaincy program, fellowship program, development program, and dementia program, and contributes other amounts to lambeth house, inc and its related organization, broadway services, inc. For their unrestricted use.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 5
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2,032.6%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 108.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $269K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.