End Domestic Abuse Wisconsin the Wi Coalition Against Domestic Violence
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391380437
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Madison, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6082550539
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,660,382
- Expenses
- $5,289,814
- Assets
- $2,557,795
- Liabilities
- $1,516,649
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MONIQUE MINKENS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MONIQUE MINKENS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $138,056 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
End domestic abuse Wisconsin: the Wisconsin coalition against domestic violence (end abuse) is a statewide, non-profit membership organization of battered women, formerly battered women, domestic abuse programs, and individuals committed to ending domestic violence.through partnerships and strategic collaborations and education, advocacy, and social action, end abuse works to prevent and eliminate domestic violence. We transform societal attitudes, practices, and policies both about violence and about women from diverse communities and their children. End abuse's mission is: the Wisconsin coalition against domestic violence promotes social change that transforms societal attitudes, practices and policies to prevent and eliminate domestic abuse.
What it reported doing in 2024
Membership: end abuse program membership provides domestic violence and dual (combined dv and sexual assault programs) access to free trainings and the ability to vote on critical issues. Allied partner memberships allow closely aligned non-profits access to these training as well. Being a member of the coalition means you have access to: 1) leadership opportunities such as the ability to serve on the end abuse board and other relevant committees; 2) participation at annual membership meetings and voting rights that influence the direction of the coalition; 3) the members area of our website that includes recorded trainings, educational materials, and publications like the legal manual; 4) free trainings on topics including legal issues, foundations of advocacy, housing, and issues facing members of the lgbtq community, as well as discounted conference fees.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 85% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.2%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 80.5%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $118.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 94.2%; rating input score 94; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.48; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.2% of revenue deployed · 80.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 17 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $136K reported
- Consistency: 29 of 31 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.