We All Rise African American Resource Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831699702
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Green Bay, WI, USA
Phone
9207859115
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,947,857
Expenses
$1,809,272
Assets
$1,103,420
Liabilities
$683,552

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBIN SCOTT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • PAUL DAVIS (PRESIDENT)
  • DR KADIHJIA KELLY LPC (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBIN SCOTT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $119,800 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of we all rise calls for the collective liberation of african americans navigating at the margins of society. This holistic approach inspires a village mentality that includes the following support: victim health services, mental health service, skill

What it reported doing in 2024

Direct services: the direct services we provide are culturally specific, trauma-sensitive, and equity-centered including support groups, mental health services, help with obtaining housing and benefits, safety planning, and advocacy for other community resource referrals. All activities are conducted by directors and advocates trained in facilitation, advocacy, and mental health support. Moreover, numerous people make frequent use of our clothing and incidental closet, youth center, job center, and education/financial services (e.g., ged classes, rent smart course, financial literacy/black business classes). These services are provided both during and outside of normal business hours to meet the population's emotional, psychological, and physical needs as they arise. This includes youth services: first and foremost youth services include the black youth alliance - wi (bya-wi), which is our culturally specific after-school program designed to increase protective factors for black youth/families including such as: increasing cultural awareness, improving attitudes about gender, improving beliefs about healthy relationships, increasing one's willingness to explore sexual identities, increasing leadership skills, improving their family support/connectedness, and ncreasing school climate. In addition, we have been awarded a grant to offer evidence-based teen pregnancy prevention programming that focuses on improving parent-child communication and increasing adolescent health awareness. Lastly, we have a youth center which is open monday through friday.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 74% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.2%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.62; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.2% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $120K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 31 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Conflict-of-interest policy not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule G fundraiser detail did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.