Eau Claire Community Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391891064
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Eau Claire, WI, USA
- Phone
- 7155523801
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Private Grantmaking Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,717,413
- Expenses
- $2,739,143
- Assets
- $55,749,544
- Liabilities
- $6,139,631
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- WESLEY ESCONDO (EXECUTIVE DI): $123,597 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To establish endowed funds that will benefit the eau claire community today and in the future.
What it reported doing in 2024
The eau claire community foundation fulfilled the grantmaking portion of its mission in 2024 by awarding 1,926,106 in grants, which includes 168,690 in agency fund grants. While many of these grants were recommended by donor advisors to nonprofits all over the u.s., 813,222 went directly to eau claire area nonprofits through eccf's annual community grant cycle. An additional 53,939 supported local nonprofits through the grant cycle implemented by the women's giving circle, a fund of eccf. Eccf's support of local nonprofits is helping to enhance the quality of life in eau claire. Eccf's mission also includes "offering donors opportunities to establish charitable legacies." eccf worked with donors to establish 59 new funds in 2024 and has over 330 active funds. Donor advised funds, such as the new rev. Kurt m. Jacobson family fund, allow fund holders to recommend grants to nonprofits of their choice, while field of interest funds allow fund holders to support specific areas of interest and designated funds name specific organizations. Eccf also allows donors to create other types of funds, including unrestricted funds to support local nonprofits through the annual community grant cycle and designated scholarship funds to support students' post-secondary educations. Eccf addresses the final portion of its mission- -to serve as a catalyst to address community needs--by educating the community about philanthropic issues and opportunities through events such as the annual meeting, professional advisor event, and the women's giving circle educational event. In addition to informing the public about eccf and its work, the annual events allow donors to connect with local nonprofits. Eccf's professional advisor event educates professional advisors about their clients' charitable giving options, while the educational event hosted by eccf's women's giving circle educates the public about pressing community issues such as homelessness, mental health, or alzheimer's disease. In 2024, the educational event addressed challenges in finding affordable childcare. Through these and other annual events, eccf aims to increase awareness, philanthropy, and activism in our community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 90% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 90
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23.2%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 78.7%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $97.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 67.2%; rating input score 67; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 80%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.35; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 23.2% of revenue deployed · 78.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 28 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 47 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 46 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.