East Harlem Scholars Academy Charter School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274713450
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2123482518
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Charter Schools

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,095,251
Expenses
$41,078,420
Assets
$154,224,666
Liabilities
$158,471,407

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARINA COFIELD (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • JEFFREY GINSBURG (FORMER CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARINA COFIELD (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $304,349 total reported compensation
  • NYASHA MANIGAULT (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $231,704 total reported compensation
  • JEFFREY GINSBURG (FORMER CEO): $229,250 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

East harlem scholars academies are public charter schools that prepare students with the skills, strength of character, and emotional well-being to excel academically, lead in their communities, and realize their best possible selves. Scholars academies were founded by east harlem tutorial program (ehtp), a community-based organization founded in 1958.

What it reported doing in 2024

East harlem scholars academies is grounded in our core values and guiding principles that help instill in our scholars a deep sense of awareness, self-advocacy, commitment to equity, and intellectual curiosity.east harlem scholars academies believes that the best learning occurs when children engage in higher-order, critical thinking. To thrive in the 21st century workforce and successfully pursue boundless possibilities, our students learn to question, analyze, and apply their learning meaningfully. Students develop the essential critical reasoning and leadership skills to succeed in their endeavors, both inside and outside the classroom. We value a nurturing and supportive environment that supports students' love of learning and of themselves. We place a premium on students' cognitive, creative, social and emotional growth, and physical health, blending rigor with joy to ensure our scholars are inspired to learn. Students explore their individual aspirations through the school experience, developing rich personal connections to their learning.our learning community instills in all scholars a deep sense of self-esteem, cultural pride, and global responsibility so that they develop into their best possible selves. Diversity is an asset to our learning space, and our scholars are engaged with and are aware of different backgrounds and perspectives as they develop a rich understanding of the world in which they live. We value active community engagement as a way to enhance educational opportunities. Families and the wider community are mutual stakeholders in our scholars' educational success. Having access to a comprehensive support system positions students to reach their fullest potential, and our scholars' commitment to service promotes our vision of social justice and a desire to help those in need.our schools are in session from 8:15 a.m. To 3:45 p.m. Monday, tuesday, thursday, and friday. On wednesdays, scholars dismiss at 1:30 p.m., after which time staff participate in professional development. Students have daily blocks of ela, math, and science or social studies, in addition to daily rotating specials/enrichment classes (e.g., spanish, physical education, or music) and recess. Our afterschool program operates monday, tuesday, thursday, friday, 3:45 - 6:00 pm; wed, 1:45 - 6:00 pm.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.1%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.94 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -13.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.75; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.03; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 31.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.1% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $304K · 23 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $3.7M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.