Dyersville Health Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205383271
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009
Location
Dyersville, IA, USA
Phone
5635898772
Rating
86
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Grantmaking Foundations N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$604,846
Expenses
$329,556
Assets
$1,871,338
Liabilities
$76,985

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID MOORE (DIRECTOR; EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID MOORE (DIRECTOR; EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $145,543 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We, mercy health services-Iowa and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.dyersville health foundation is a member of mercy health services-Iowa and trinity health.

What it reported doing in 2024

The purpose of the dyersville health foundation (the foundation) is to enhance health care in the dyersville service area by providing financial assistance to mercyone dyersville medical center, mercyone senior care (a division of mercyone dubuque medical center, a related organization) and the ellen kennedy living center.from the first efforts to build a hospital in dyersville in the 1960s, the existence and success of mercyone dyersville medical center has depended to a great extent on community volunteerism and philanthropic giving. The foundation is committed to making sure that community support remains strong, thereby keeping health care services in the community strong.the mercy - dyersville auxiliary comes under the umbrella of the foundation. The auxiliary raises funds for equipment and program support through annual dues, the holiday festival and the hospital gift shop. Additional support for the foundation comes from estates, memorials, local organizations and individuals. The foundation board represents the communities served and oversees all aspects of the foundation and makes sure that all funds raised here will be used here.our goal for fiscal year 2025 was to raise funds for the emergency department at mercyone dyersville medical center.please visit our website for additional information: www.mercyone.org/dubuque/dyersville/dyersville-foundation

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.6%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: $57.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 45.5%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.68; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.4%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.6% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $320K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $146K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 310 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.