Democracy Unlimited

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680394751
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
Phone
9163188040
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Education N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$125,693
Expenses
$88,363
Assets
$65,249
Liabilities
$6,758

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIEL LEE (PRESIDENT)
  • TARA INGRAM (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHELLE WILLIAMS (DIRECTOR/INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR): $6,977 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Democracy Unlimited uplifts people to build a world where our systems of power prioritize the well-being of humans and the living world. We reclaim authority that has been unjustly seized by governments and corporations - all with the aim of cultivating a genuinely democratic society including actively working in solidarity with mutual aid groups rooted in an anti-oppression framework, advocating for urgent climate solutions, and ending profit driven agendas. We will win by building networks for community-driven change and collective action, preparing the ground for constitutional reform and systemic transformation while promoting non-violent popular uprisings.

What it reported doing in 2025

Move to Amend Education Fund Provides grants to Move to Amend to educate the general public, allied organizations, and affiliated grassroots movements about the history of democracy and corporations in the United States, the impact that the current state of democracy has on social movements to achieve their mission, and on solutions to end corporate constitutional rights and get money out of politics; to support and act in solidarity with organizations working on solutions that would be achievable with an end of corporate constitutional rights and money as speech; and to connect with other organizations dedicated to creating a diverse, independent, powerful and authentic democracy movement. ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Granted funds to Move to Amend for the following activities: 1) production and distribution of approximately 45 national educational webinars and public forums, including structured multi-part series, monthly educational programs, standalone public briefings, 77 direct educational and outreach emails and 101 educational videos reels shared as social media. For example, a) National Educational Webinars and Forums which included the four-part series co-sponsored with Veterans for Peace to examine corporate power and global systems (Striking at the Roots of Imperialism); b) monthly series to analyze lessons from historic U.S. social movements (Cultural Change for the We the People Amendment); c) an educational analysis of election spending and democratic governance (Your Vote, Their Million $: Big Money and the NYC 2025 Mayoral Election); d) series of educational briefings that analyze current events through the lens of constitutional history and corporate governance (Corporate Coup Report; e) to host presentations on the constitutional amendment process and its relevance to current constitutional challenges with Madiba Dennie, attorney, professor and author of The Originalism Trap: How Extremists Stole the Constitution and How We the People Can Take It Back (Our Right and Duty to Create an Equitable Democracy & Constitution) and Wilfred Codrington III, constitutional law professor, (It Takes a Constitutional Amendment, Stupid). ***** 2) presentation at The 22nd Century Conference and Next Systems Studies: Forging a People-Powered Democracy, addressing constitutional history, democratic structure, and civic reform theory. ***** 3) expansion of civic education through the Movement Education Program (MEP) with a) new curriculum module in 2025 titled The Way Through: From Overwhelm, Burnout, Despair & Anger into Effective Action; and b) national workshops supporting sustainable civic participation; c) two volunteer education sessions training participants in constitutional literacy and grassroots organizing fundamentals. ***** 4) convene Monthly Environmental Education through the Ecology Network (Eco-Net). a) discussions exploring the relationship between corporate power and environmental crisis that featured climate and civic leaders including David Orr and Dr. Christopher Basaldú. b) to archived and distributed recordings for continued public learning. ***** 5) production of legal and constitutional education materials through the Law & Research Committee that analyze the development and impact of corporate constitutional rights and money as speech for distribution nationally for use by affiliates, scholars, students, and community leaders to strengthen public understanding of constitutional law and democratic governance. Major reports published in 2025 included: a) Democracy in the Gaps (May 2025); b) Artificial Intelligence, Free Speech, and Corporate Constitutional Rights (July 2025); c) Statements of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Against Corporate Constitutional Rights; and d) Statement Supporting Ending Corporate Constitutional Rights and Money as Free Speech as well as e) comparative analyses of proposed constitutional amendments, including side-by-side examinations of the We the People Amendment (H.J.Res. 54) and other fe

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 57
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 80
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 52.3%; rating input score 52
  • Program expense ratio: 74.4%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.7%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.1%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -13.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 52.3% of revenue deployed · 74.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $66K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $7K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.