Move to Amend
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464306740
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9163188040
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Civil Rights, Social Action, Advocacy N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $195,094
- Expenses
- $196,108
- Assets
- $19,782
- Liabilities
- $29,234
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TARA INGRAM (PRESIDENT)
- Daniel Lee (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- LEESA FRIDAY (DIRECTOR)
- TARA INGRAM (PRESIDENT)
- KEYAN BLISS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Move to Amend is a coalition of hundreds of organizations and hundreds of thousands of individuals committed to social and economic justice, ending corporate rule, and building a vibrant democracy that is genuinely accountable to the people, not corporate interests.
What it reported doing in 2025
Outreach & Community Building: Targeted talks, presentations & writings prepared for engagement with allied organizations to educate about the history of democracy and corporations in the United States, the impact that the current state of democracy has on their struggle to achieve their mission, and solutions to end corporate constitutional rights and get money out of politics; as well supporting and acting in solidarity with organizations working on solutions that would be achievable with an end of corporate constitutional rights and money as speech; and connecting with organizations dedicated to creating a diverse, independent, powerful and authentic democracy movement. ACCOMPLISHMENTS: 1)Participated in national conferences and strategy gatherings focused on democracy reform and constitutional change, including the (Resist and Rebuild Conference) and the (Democracy 2076) convening addressing long-term constitutional reform strategies ****2) Delivered educational presentations and trainings on corporate constitutional rights and constitutional reform at conferences and academic programs including presentations for scholars in the (Next Systems Convergence) initiative and programs hosted through George Mason University.****3) Organized and supported affiliate-led grassroots activities nationwide including Earth Day outreach, Independence Day democracy education events, Constitution Day programming, and local petitioning and educational campaigns.****4) Participated in public advocacy events and rallies highlighting the influence of corporate power on public policy, including national demonstrations and issue-focused mobilizations addressing militarism, corporate influence, and democracy reform.****5) Organized grassroots initiatives and collaborations including public film screenings, educational podcasts, and community forums hosted by affiliates and partner organizations.****6) Convened the Ecology Network (Eco-Net), a monthly national relationship-building forum examining the relationship between corporate political power and environmental crisis, featuring discussions with environmental leaders and scholars including David Orr, Dr. Christopher Basaldú, and John Seakwood.****7) Convened the Law and Research Committee composed of legal professionals and researchers who meet regularly to analyze corporate constitutional rights doctrine and develop educational materials supporting the campaign for constitutional reform.****8) Produced legal research and policy analysis addressing constitutional reform proposals, including statements and side-by-side comparisons evaluating multiple proposed constitutional amendments addressing money in politics and corporate political power.****9) Organized the Labor Caucus to strengthen collaboration between democracy reform advocates and labor organizers, including training sessions on outreach to organized labor and educational programs connecting worker rights and democratic governance.****10) Supported national labor solidarity organizing including May Day mobilizations and Labor Day educational programming highlighting the connections between economic power, worker rights, and democratic reform.****11)Expanded a national coalition supporting constitutional reform to 815 endorsing organizations and advocacy partners.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.7%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.48; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.7% of revenue deployed · 70.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $138K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.