Cp Foundation of Nassau Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113460345
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Roosevelt, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5163782000
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $18,276
- Expenses
- $12,874
- Assets
- $129,945
- Liabilities
- $120,267
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT SPINA (PRESIDENT)
- PETER DOLAN (ASSISTANCE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KAREN GELLER-HITTLEMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MARY LOU ZIZZO (COUNCIL PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- NORMAN FISHBEIN (TREASURER)
- ROBERT SPINA (PRESIDENT)
- ERNEST BARTOL (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Solicit, maintain and receive funds and property, and to use and apply these funds and the income generated therefrom exclusively to support and benefit nassau cerebral palsy association and its affiliates.
What it reported doing in 2024
Cp foundation of nassau, inc. Was formed to solicit, receive, and maintain funds to support nassau cerebral palsy association, inc. And certain other affiliates.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.2%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.6%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.09; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.93; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -31.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.