Nassau Cerebral Palsy Guardianship Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
113134256
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Roosevelt, NY, USA
Phone
5163782000
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,013
Expenses
$3,478
Assets
$71,884
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KAREN HITTLEMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • VINCENT J RUSSO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TERESA BREEN (DIRECTOR)
  • ERIC EINHART (SECRETARY)
  • KAREN HITTLEMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nassau cerebral palsy guardianship corporation is incorporated in New York state under section 402 of the not-for-profit corporation law for the purpose of serving as guardian, standby guardian or alternate guardian of persons with cerebral palsy or other related issues.

What it reported doing in 2024

Nassau cerebral palsy guardianship corporation provides vital guardianship services to individuals with disabilities who do not have the financial resources to pay for them. The corporation provides assurance that decisions are made in each person's best interest by accessing good health care and medical supports, ensuring appropriate residential and day programming, exploring appropriate employment or vocational needs, fulfilling religious wishes, offering social and recreational opportunities, and providing guidance and legal support. The corporation assures that decisions are made on each person's behalf by people who know them well and are mandated to make decisions solely based on what is in their best interests.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.2%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 20.67; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -21.4% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.