Council on Addiction Prevention and Education of Dutchess County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222804639
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Wappingers Falls, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8457658301
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Drunk Driving Related
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,076,165
- Expenses
- $1,069,034
- Assets
- $1,506,124
- Liabilities
- $1,211,414
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT J RANIERI JR (PRESIDENT)
- ELEANORE REILLY (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DANA NALBANDIAN (INTERIM AGENCY DIRECTOR): $68,132 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To be recognized as the premier substance abuse and addiction prevention provider in the midhudson region by implementing nationally established educational programs, policies, and services.
What it reported doing in 2024
Providing evidence based prevention education and counseling services to dutchess county youth and families surrounding issues related to at risk behavior, in particular the misuse/abuse of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs (atod). The organization offers various programs and services including the following: alive at 25this is a court-mandated, four-and-a-half-hour, evidence-based driver's awareness course. The class is designed by the national safety council for young drivers ages 16-24. Participants gain awareness, develop safety strategies, and build a foundation for healthy and responsible decision-making. Cape's prevention educators are certified by the national safety council. This is a fee-based program.blindspotsan educational intervention (designed for parents and guardians) that allows participants to explore a model teen bedroom and identify paraphernalia and other possible indicators of substance use/misuse. Follow-up includes a presentation to review and discuss the various paraphernalia in the model room. Health and wellness college & community consortiuma group of representatives from colleges in the mid-hudson valley area meets quarterly to discuss common challenges and to come up with strategies for dealing with a number of addiction issues, including substance and alcohol use.peer engagement specialiststhe peer specialists will assist individuals and families facing the substance use disorder/addiction, by helping them navigate the existing systems and services that can lead to recovery.prevention education programsprovide evidence-based presentations in schools, colleges, community-based organizations, and businesses throughout the county related to drinking and driving, underage drinking, alcohol and substance use, and gambling. This program also works with the school-based sadd chapters.prevention education & counseling program (project success)provides licensed counselors in 4 districts and 10 schools offering substance use/addiction prevention education and counseling to students, faculties, families, and communities through individual and group counseling, information and referral services, and family communication programs.local schools that currently offer our prevention counseling services include john jay senior high school, van wyck junior high school, rck high school, wappingers junior high school, millbrook middle/high school, red hook high school, arlington high school, and dover plains middle/high school.professional education programa series of substance use-related trainings sponsored by the council and certified by nys oasas. Cape is a nys oasas certified prevention provider and trainer.screening brief intervention and referral to treatment (sbirt) (teen intervene)an evidence-based early intervention model used as a tool to assess at-risk individuals, and where appropriate, refer to treatment. This intervention uses motivational interviewing as a means to engage individuals in identifying their needs and seeking the level of assistance that they require to manage substance use issues. This can be a fee-based program.teen driving: a family affaira locally developed program that brings the victim impact panel model into local high schools as part of the student's application for their parking permit, which allows them to drive to school. The program mandates that both the student and a parent attend this modified vip, which includes victims of substance-related crashes as well as representatives from the district attorney's office, the insurance industry and the medical community. Parents and students gain an understanding of the serious legal, medical, insurance, and emotional costs of driving distracted and of driving under the influence.teen intervenean evidence-based program for teenagers (age 12-19) who exhibit mild to moderate problems associated with alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs. Motivational interviewing techniques guide this intervention to develop/improve communication and copin
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 66% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.4%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.8; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.1% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.4% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $896K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $68K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.