Conservation Society of California

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
941687847
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Oakland, CA, USA
Phone
5106329525
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Zoo, Zoological Society

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$35,008,424
Expenses
$36,079,027
Assets
$92,877,800
Liabilities
$7,152,680

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NIKHIL DEHEJIA (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • NIKHIL DEHEJIA (CEO): $358,624 total reported compensation
  • ADAM MILLER (CFAO): $215,778 total reported compensation
  • BIRUK WELDHANA (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $198,753 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of California deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

What it reported doing in 2024

Oakland zoo is proud of its continued success in animal care and welfare, learning and engagement, and conservation initiatives. The zoo is home to over 700 animals that our staff provide industry leading care for to ensure their physical and social wellbeing. Conservation is core to our mission, and the zoo continues to focus its efforts on ten species including african elephants, chimpanzees, bison, african lions, California condors, and more. Our veterinary and animal care teams continue our local wildlife rescue work with oakland's city bird, the black crowned night heron, and we rescued our 30th mountain lion in 2025. Continued on schedule o.we are the first zoo in the united states to receive funding for a dedicated position to address animal welfare rescue and the wildlife trade, which is devasting species and habitats internationally. Last year we expanded our onsite guest education providing animal highlight programs to 30,000 guests and enhancing our docent offerings to increase knowledge of biodiversity. And we celebrated the one-year anniversary of the conservation education center we helped to open in uganda, which has now provided services for over 5,000 local community members coexisting with chimpanzees and other species. Alongside our programmatic work the zoo welcomed 58,000 guests for free during fiscal year 2025, providing our community with a space for connection, hope, and lifelong memories. In 2023, the zoo established a four-year strategic plan with input from thousands of community stakeholders. The following key priorities remain our focus through 2027:- inspiring action for animals and the planet- expanding leadership in animal wellbeing and rescue- deepening our conservation impact- enhancing our team culture and organizational effectiveness

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 64% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.1%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 79.3%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Pass
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 92.5%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.57; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.1% of revenue deployed · 79.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $359K · 27 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $268K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 38 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 25 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.