Felidae Conservation Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205089093
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2010
Location
Mill Valley, CA, USA
Phone
4158774050
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Wildlife Preservation, Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$642,938
Expenses
$467,439
Assets
$923,061
Liabilities
$3,959

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ZARA MCDONALD (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ZARA MCDONALD (PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR): $90,520 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Felidae's global mission1. Conserve wild cats & biodiversity: protect 40+ wild felid species and their habitats worldwide.2. Advance science & innovation: conduct cutting-edge research on wildlife health, genetics, and ecosystem dynamics.3. Champion one health: integrate wildlife, ecosystem, and public health to address zoonotic disease and environmental change.4. Engage communities: empower citizen scientists and local partners through education, outreach, and capacity building.5. Global to local impact: from California's pumas and bobcats to cheetahs in kenya and wild cats in bhutan and south america.

What it reported doing in 2024

Patagonia wild cats projectthe patagonia wild cats project focuses on the conservation of pumas and lesser-known wild cats in southern south america through research, education, and community collaboration. The project investigates predator-prey dynamics, human-wildlife conflict, and ecosystem health across working landscapes. Using non-invasive methods such as camera traps and fecal surveys, felidae and local partners collect vital data to inform regional conservation strategies. The project also engages communities and landowners to promote coexistence, reduce conflict, and sustain biodiversity across patagonia's fragile ecosystems.technologies for conservation wildepod and wilde backyard are innovative technologies developed by felidae to advance wildlife research and community engagement. Wildepod, an ai-powered cloud database, centralizes global wildlife data from camera traps, genetic sampling, and health monitoring to accelerate conservation insights and collaboration across projects. Wilde backyard, a mobile app, empowers the public to record and share neighborhood wildlife observations, contributing to real-time biodiversity mapping and citizen science. Together, these tools bridge science and community participation, enhancing conservation outcomes and promoting coexistence with local wildlife.bhutan wild cats projectthe bhutan wild cat health project applies a one health approach to study and protect nine wild cat species across bhutan, linking wildlife, ecosystem, and human health. The project operates in partnership with bhutan's government and local institutions to advance non-invasive monitoring and disease surveillance. Felidae has established bhutan's first k9 conservation detection unitsourced from the country's large free-roaming dog populationto support fecal surveys and parasite detection. The project builds national research capacity through hands-on training, field surveys, and data analysis, strengthening conservation science and public awareness of biodiversity and coexistence.ca bobcat projectthe ca bobcat project advances science-based, non-invasive research on bobcat populations across the san francisco bay area and orange county. Using camera traps, fecal and hair surveys, and community reports, the project monitors health, genetics, and movement to assess impacts of urbanization and disease. Findings inform wildlife management, connectivity planning, and public education on coexistence. Supported by donors and partners, babp strengthens regional biodiversity and contributes to felidae's one health conservation mission.wild cat health projectthe wild cat health project applies a one health approach to assess the health of pumas and bobcats in California's urbanwildland interface, including the bay area and orange county. Using non-invasive monitoring such as fecal and hair surveys, the project investigates exposure to pathogens, toxins, and other indicators of ecosystem and public health. Accomplishments include developing regional health baselines for wild felids, identifying zoonotic risk factors, and advancing early-warning systems for disease spillover. Supported by donors, partners, and collaborating veterinarians, wchp strengthens science-driven conservation and informs public health strategies.grand staircase escalante (gse) cougar projectthe gse cougar project investigates puma ecology and population health within the grand staircaseescalante national monument in Utah. In collaboration with the bureau of land management, state wildlife agencies, and university researchers, the gse project uses non-invasive methodscamera traps, fecal dna, and track surveysto document cougar movements, habitat connectivity, and prey dynamics. Accomplishments include establishing baseline health and population data, identifying critical wildlife corridors, and engaging local communities and land managers in science-based coexistence and conservation strategies that strengthen ecosystem resilience.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.3%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 96.8%; rating input score 97
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 27.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.97; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.4%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.3% of revenue deployed · 96.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $453K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $91K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.