Community Bridges Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942880847
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Mesa, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 4808333297
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $225,178,320
- Expenses
- $214,465,493
- Assets
- $87,844,001
- Liabilities
- $48,656,300
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS GLOVER (PRESIDENT)
- JEFFERY CASE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MARY CAMELI (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- JOHN HOGEBOOM (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN HOGEBOOM (PRESIDENT/CEO): $668,112 total reported compensation
- DR ANNETTE LUSKO (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $566,262 total reported compensation
- RAMON DOMINGUEZ (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $544,867 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To maintain the dignity of human life through the operation of a comprehensive and fully integrated continuum of care through shelter and housing programs, behavioral health and substance abuse use crisis and inpatient services, behavioral health and substance abuse residential treatment facilities, community-based outreach, and fully integrated patient centered medical homes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Crisis: cbi provides facility-based crisis/observation services on a voluntary and involuntary basis in Arizona. Crisis services are medically monitored by an integrated team of medical, behavioral and paraprofessionals. Triage, assessments, and referral services are provided. Patients determined to meet medical necessity criteria for additional services are transitioned to an inpatient level of care for either psychiatric or medical detoxification services. Patients receiving crisis services may also receive warm transfers into an integrated outpatient, residential treatment and/or referrals to housing and other supportive services based on individual needs. Cbi also provides crisis mobile services in Arizona, Oklahoma and washinton dc with the goal of resolving immediate behavioral health crisis in the community and assisting with transition to an appropriate level of care.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 64% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 86.6%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 86.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 6 filed program accomplishments · $185.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $668K · 25 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $10.3M reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 20 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.