Colorado Youth Corps Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 841532028
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3038630600
- Rating
- 94
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,481,268
- Expenses
- $11,094,993
- Assets
- $3,342,422
- Liabilities
- $1,899,782
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT SEGERSTROM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- SCOTT SEGERSTROM (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $130,782 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Colorado youth corps association serves on behalf of conservation corps that transform lives and communities through service, personal development and education statewide.
What it reported doing in 2024
Corps support & project management:1)supported statewide youth participation of 1994 youth at 8 independently operating conservation service corps;2)provided land managers with 385 weeks of work throughout the state;3)coordinated $5,118,242 in statewide fee-for-service contracts with public lands managers including cyca's admin fees; expenses: $4,742,923 against contract pass-through income of $4,520,696; of this activity, $1,173,659 in pass-thru income was billed to the coswap (Colorado strategic wildfire action program); another $212,640 in pass-thru income was billed to Colorado parks & wildlife state trails-off-highway vehicle program. 4)renewed americorps fixed award grant, "youth corps for Colorado", for program year 2023 (py2023) starting 1.1.2024; expenses $2,953,537 against grant pass-through income of $2,922,066. Income and expense both include a quarterly commission of approx. 2.1% to serve Colorado, of $81,015. In 2024 cyca billed py2022 admin fee of $70,384 and py2023 admin fee of $120,252. The balance of py2023 admin fee was billed in january 2025. Income total includes $69,466 billed in january for december 2023 corpsmember hours. In 2024, americorps provided americorps education awards for 414 young people: ft (1700 hrs) to 6 members at $6895 ea = $41,370.00 tqt (1200 hrs) to 30 members at $4826.50 = $144,795.00 ht (900 hrs) to 30 members at $3447.50 = $103,425.00 rpt (675 hrs) to 57 members at $2626.27 = $149,697.39 qt (450 hrs) to 141 members at $1824.07 = $257,193.87 mt (300 hrs) to 150 members at $1459.26 = $218,889.00for a total of $915,370.26. Note that cyca admin fee for ycco grant billed in 2024 included $70,384 for py2022 and $120,252 for py2023.b) in 2024, under this same program, cyca provided financial support for americorps program costs-per-member through 6 participating conservation service corps; conservation legacy (aka scc) - 92 members totaling $409,637.46larimer county conservation corps - 45 members totaling $260,054.46mile high youth corps (2 locations: denver and southern front range) - 123 members totaling $854,507.05rocky mountain youth corps - 176 members totaling $1,132,230.99weld county youth conservation corps - 22 members totaling $112,543.43western Colorado conservation corps - 6 members totaling $33,922.16for a grand total of 464 members totaling $2,802,895.555) in addition, in 2024 cyca enrolled members under a second americorps fixed award grant, "Colorado climate corps (aka Colorado community corps)."under this program in py2023, cyca passed through $1,922,103 in expenses vs. Pass-thru income of $1,888,543; income and expense both include serve Colorado commission of approx. 2.1%, of $50,288. In 2024 cyca billed py2022 admin fee of $52,234 and py2023 admin fee of $120,106. The balance of py2023 admin fee was billed in 2025. In 2024, americorps provided americorps education awards for 275 young people: tqt (1200 hrs) to 15 members at $4826.50 = $72,397.50ht (900 hrs) to 40 members at $3447.50 = $137,900.00rpt (675 hrs) to 43 members at $2626.27 = $112,929.61qt (450 hrs) to 54 members at $1824.07 = $98,499.78mt (300 hrs) to 123 members at $1459.26 = $179,488.98for a total of $601,215.87 b) in 2024, under this same program, cyca provided financial support for americorps program costs-per-member through 5 participating conservation service corps: conservation legacy (scc-fc and scc-lv) - 73 members totaling $427,379.81larimer county conservation corps - 15 members totaling $66,597.18mile high youth corps (2 locations: denver & southern front range) - 99 members totaling $548,616.34rocky mountain youth corps - 57 members totaling $387,683.02western Colorado conservation corps - 69 members totaling $410,290.34for a grand total of 313 members totaling $1,840,566.696. In cooperation with bureau of land management, we enrolled or continued 63 interns, 3 of whom served term extensions, for a total pass-thru cost of $973,456.27.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 66% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 94% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.3%; rating input score 98
- Fundraising efficiency: $291.06 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.57; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.4% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $10.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $131K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.