Christian Care Mesa Iii

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203253081
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6023851592
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Development, Construction, Management
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$398,497
Expenses
$435,587
Assets
$5,949,833
Liabilities
$8,118,173

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALAN HIEB (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALAN HIEB (PRESIDENT/CEO): $615,586 total reported compensation
  • KATHLEEN CONDON (CFO): $270,818 total reported compensation
  • RENA PHILLIPS (VP OF OPERATIONS): $216,796 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

What it reported doing in 2024

Christian care mesa iii, inc. "d.b.a. The oasis at historic mesa" is located in mesa, az. Opened in 2010, the oasis is a 40-unit assisted living facility with a 20 bed memory care center for low and middle-income seniors. The oasis provides 1 bedroom & studio apartments with walk in showers; a dining room; activity room; beauty shop and library. The building is leased in its entirety to christian care mesa ii, inc. Dba fellowship square historic mesa. Fellowship square historic mesa operates assisted living services to residents and is currently licensed for 66 residents. Services provided include membership in the senior fit wellness program, cable television and internet availability, 3 meals per day, transportation to banks and grocery stores; recreational activities, (cont'd on schedule o) chaplain services and 24-hour security with an emergency call system. Christian care is an active participant in quality initiatives that promote healthy, affordable, and ethical aging services in association with leading age and the health services advisory group (hsag).founded in 1979, the christian care companies began with 96 units of subsidized housing and a nursing center on the phoenix campus. The nursing center cornerstone quotes psalm 71:9, cast me not off in the time of old age; forsake me not when my strength faileth. The organization is one of 17 related tax exempt christian care companies (the names of the other 16 are listed on schedule r) who provide housing, hospitality and healthcare services for very-low-to-middle income Arizona seniors. 16 of the christian care companies were founded by the nondenominational christian churches of Arizona and are governed by corporate boards of directors. Christian care management has controlling interest in the 17th related tax exempt entity, home health care, inc. Dba covenant home health, which provides home health services to seniors and others who need skilled medical care within the comfort and privacy of their own homes.at december 31, 2024, the christian care companies own and operate 1,990 units of middle-income, market-rate independent, assisted, and memory care units for seniors on six campuses, 338 units of subsidized housing, and a 20-bed rehabilitation center. In addition, we provide assisted living services to up to 107 residents of our subsidized housing.benefits of being part of a christian care community typically include shared housekeeping; maintenance and security services, including call button monitoring; access to private scheduled transportation; and computer labs with high-speed internet. Residents typically have entree to on-campus food service venues, entertaining activity programs, health & wellness opportunities and chaplaincy services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94.1%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.66; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.36; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 37.7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $410K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $616K · 14 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 19 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.