Fellowship Square

Legal name: Christian Care Management Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942756711
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Phoenix, AZ, USA
Phone
6023851592
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,847,011
Expenses
$6,429,862
Assets
$22,510,733
Liabilities
$22,865,370

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALAN HIEB (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALAN HIEB (PRESIDENT/CEO): $615,586 total reported compensation
  • EDWARD JOHNSON (CHF HUMAN RESOURCE OFFICER/CCO): $311,410 total reported compensation
  • JON SCOTT WILLIAMS (VP OF OPERATIONS): $286,942 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Fellowship Square (Christian Care) is a Christian, 501(c)(3) nonprofit serving seniors in Arizona through quality senior living and related services, including independent living, assisted living, memory care, and short-term rehab—reinvesting its mission into residents’ wellbeing. Across Arizona, each Fellowship Square community offers a balance of comfort, connection, and support. As nonprofit 501(c)(3) organizations, our mission drives every decision we make — reinvesting in programs, services, and experiences that support residents’ wellbeing. Each Fellowship Square community offers: |. Our communities in Cottonwood, Historic Mesa, Mesa, Phoenix, Surprise, and Tucson each bring their own personality and offer varying levels of care, services, and amenities. However, they all share the same commitment to our Mission: _Through Christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to_...

What it reported doing in 2024

Providing enhanced liquidity and support to the qualified christian care companies, who provide housing and healthcare services to the extremely-low to moderate income seniors and disabled adults. Founded in 1979, the christian care companies began with 96 units of subsidized housing and a nursing center on the phoenix campus. The nursing center cornerstone quotes psalm 71:9, cast me not off in the time of old age; forsake me not when my strength faileth. The organization is one of 17 related tax exempt christian care companies (the names of the other 16 are listed on schedule r) who provide housing, hospitality and healthcare (continued on sch. O) services for very-low-to-middle income Arizona seniors. 16 of the christian care companies were founded by the nondenominational christian churches of Arizona and are governed by corporate boards of directors. Christian care management has controlling interest in the 17th related tax exempt entity, home health care, inc. Dba covenant home health, which provides home health services to seniors and others who need skilled medical care within the comfort and privacy of their own homes.at december 31, 2024, the christian care companies own and operate 1,990 units of middle-income, market-rate independent, assisted, and memory care units for seniors on six campuses, 338 units of subsidized housing, and a 20-bed rehabilitation center. In addition, we provide assisted living services to up to 107 residents of our subsidized housing.benefits of being part of a christian care community typically include shared housekeeping; maintenance and security services, including call button monitoring; access to private scheduled transportation; and computer labs with high-speed internet. Residents typically have entree to on-campus food service venues, entertaining activity programs, health & wellness opportunities and chaplaincy services.christian care management, inc., provides strategic direction, development, human resources, accounting, payroll, budgetary, fundraising, information technology and corporate management support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 95
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.4%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 82.5%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.35 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.5; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.02; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 76.4% of revenue deployed · 82.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $616K · 23 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $335K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 19 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.