Fellowship Square
Legal name: Christian Care Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201239464
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2022
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6023851592
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,427,808
- Expenses
- $374,414
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BARBARA CARR (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- THOMAS KERINS (VICE-PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT)
- CHRISTINE GUERIN (DIRECTOR/VICE-PRESIDENT)
- ALAN HIEB (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ALAN HIEB (PRESIDENT/CEO): $483,799 total reported compensation
- EDWARD JOHNSON (CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCE OFFICER): $256,872 total reported compensation
- KATHLEEN CONDON (CFO): $208,485 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Christian Care (a 501(c)(3) nonprofit) was founded in 1979 by Christians to minister to Arizona seniors—especially those with limited financial resources—through faith-based senior living services such as Independent Living, Assisted Living, and Memory Care across multiple Arizona communities. Across Arizona, each Fellowship Square community offers a balance of comfort, connection, and support. As nonprofit 501(c)(3) organizations, our mission drives every decision we make — reinvesting in programs, services, and experiences that support residents’ wellbeing. Each Fellowship Square community offers: |. Our communities in Cottonwood, Historic Mesa, Mesa, Phoenix, Surprise, and Tucson each bring their own personality and offer varying levels of care, services, and amenities. However, they all share the same commitment to our Mission: _Through Christian love and excellence, we are...
What it reported doing in 2022
Christian care foundation accomplishes its mission by securing philanthropic gifts and then administering these gifts with biblical principles. The foundation works with donors (residents, family members, employees, friends, and volunteers) to provide the giving options that fit the donor's philanthropic wishes to support christian care's mission to provide a fulfilling lifestyle and promote independence to those we serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - Most voting board members are independent and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 15
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 7.9%; rating input score 8
- Program expense ratio: 30.1%; rating input score 30
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 73.8%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 47%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 7.9% of revenue deployed · 30.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $113K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $484K · 12 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 27 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.