Charterhouse Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411405254
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Rochester, MN, USA
- Phone
- 5075381297
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,368,949
- Expenses
- $21,762,046
- Assets
- $56,022,896
- Liabilities
- $44,110,310
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ABENSTEIN MD JOHN P (DIRECTOR): $533,399 total reported compensation
- GASTINEAU MD DENNIS A (DIRECTOR): $511,728 total reported compensation
- CASCINO MD TERRANCE L (FORMER VICE CHAIR): $376,799 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To inspire hope and contribute to health and well-being by providing the best care to every resident served by passionate and dedicated staff so that charterhouse is a preferred place to live and work.
What it reported doing in 2014
Program service accomplishments (see sch o)program service accomplishments (see sch o)charterhouse is a retirement living community whose purpose is to meet the physical, emotional, recreational, and similar needs of elderly persons. Charterhouse residents occupied 203 independent living units in 2014. Charterhouse provides a cultural arts room, craft rooms, fitness center, greenhouse, chapel, library, music room, and other facilities to enhance the well-being of residents. A secured, year-round skyway-subway system links charterhouse to the mayo clinic campus and the downtown business community.charterhouse operates on a nondiscriminatory basis, regardless of race, color, sex, religion or national origin.charterhouse provides a continuum of services to meet the healthcare needs of residents. The continuum includes a state licensed medicare certified 32-bed skilled nursing facility, a short term rehabilitation center, and a licensed certified home health care agency. The short term rehabilitation center accepts both residents and nonresidents for its program. In 2014, the skilled nursing facility admitted 482 patients, with a total of 7,734 patient days. The home health agency is staffed by registered nurses and experienced health care aides and it provides services to residents that help them remain in their independent living environment for as long as possible. Services provided by the home health agency personnel range from personal grooming to meal preparation. Charterhouse has a 32-bed care facility called the supportive care center licensed by the Minnesota department of health. In this setting, licensed nursing staff provide residents 24-hour a day assistance with their daily living activities.charterhouse also has a 49 unit residential setting called the assisted living center. This center serves residents who are not able to live independently in an apartment, but do not require the skilled nursing care provided in the health center. Personal care services in this facility are provided by the home health agency.charterhouse maintains continuing arrangements with other organizations, facilities, and health personnel to provide access to the services of physical, occupational, and speech therapists, hearing aid and eyeglass services, a geriatric continuity clinic and a podiatry clinic, to meet the healthcare needs of its residents.charterhouse also offers an array of support services including assistance with grocery shopping, meal preparation, personal laundry and linen, bathing, dressing, personal correspondence, and an escort service to and from community events and appointments.charterhouse maintains in residence older persons who become unable to pay regular charges. Such residents are entitled to remain in their apartments and to receive charterhouse's normal and routine services, as long as they have not willfully dissipated their personal assets. Charterhouse maintains a benevolent care fund to assist needy residents in meeting their financial obligation to charterhouse.uncompensated care: charterhouse provides a variety of financial assistance options to patients who meet established criteria. The medicare shortfall during 2014 within charterhouse's skilled nursing facility was approximately $1,802,800. In addition, charterhouse provided $39,998 in charitable assistance to residents no longer able to afford their units. Charterhouse paid $98,263 to mncare - a program that offers healthcare assistance to low income populations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 37
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.1%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 96.8%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.9%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.57; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.79; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.1% of revenue deployed · 96.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $21.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $533K · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $2.7M reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 58 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.