Charitable Properties Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 134240753
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019
- Location
- Mesquite, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9726863100
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,302,892
- Expenses
- $4,384,263
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SABRINA PORTER (PRESIDENT/ CEO)
- PHIL R ELMORE (FORMER PRESIDENT/ CEO)
- RANDY RICHEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MES IL)
- SUSANNE ISREAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HCBS)
- MATTHEW TROY MCKNIGHT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LWV)
Highest reported compensation
- DOUGLAS C HARRISON (CFO & COO): $291,785 total reported compensation
- SABRINA PORTER (PRESIDENT/ CEO): $269,961 total reported compensation
- JONATHAN M SPENCER (CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER): $221,290 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To hold properties of christian care centers inc., a 501 (c)(3) organization.
What it reported doing in 2019
To hold properties of christian care centers, inc. A 501(c)(3) organization.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.6%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 39.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.6% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $292K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.