Christian Care Centers Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 750859664
IRS 990 coverage: 2010–2020
Forms available: Form 990 2020
Location: Mesquite, TX, USA
Phone: 9726863100
Rating: 84
Verdict: STRONG
Rating confidence: Moderate
Sector: Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Affiliation: Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue: $38,224,104
Expenses: $41,858,335
Assets: $74,221,740
Liabilities: $70,203,062

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

SABRINA RENEE PORTER (PRESIDENT/CEO)
SUSANNE ISREAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HCBS)
PHIL R ELMORE (FORMER PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

SABRINA RENEE PORTER (PRESIDENT/CEO): $257,277 total reported compensation
JONATHAN M SPENCER (SECRETARY/CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER): $222,506 total reported compensation
KAREN JOHNSON (CORPORATE DIRECTOR, CLINICAL SERVICE): $194,499 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Christian care communities and services is a faith-based ministry providing innovative and loving care for those we serve.

What it reported doing in 2020

Provides three senior living communities that serves seniors in the dallas/fort worth metroplex as a faith based, not-for-profit provider. The senior living communities provide independent living, assisted living, alzheimer's, dementia, and memory care assisted living, skilled nursing and rehab, home2stay personal assistance services, and hospice care which enables the residents to thrive in an environment that encourages relationships through spirit, physical, social, and recreational programs.

Operating model

Revenue model: Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 84
Transparency & Controls: 85
Accountability: 100
Sustainability: 28
Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 96.8%; rating input score 97
Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

Operating margin: -9.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.77; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.95; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 96.8% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $37.3M in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $257K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.2M reported
Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.