Central Jersey Family Health Consortium Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223197191
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
North Brunswick, NJ, USA
Phone
7329375437
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health - General and Rehabilitative N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,018,631
Expenses
$20,892,738
Assets
$13,111,056
Liabilities
$9,586,985

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

42 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KATHLEEN MAHONEY (PRESIDENT)
  • PAM HARMON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • WAYNE FELLMETH (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • ROBYN DORIA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROBYN DORIA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $361,598 total reported compensation
  • JOCELYN CLAUDIO (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $262,311 total reported compensation
  • LAURA TAYLOR (CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER): $213,201 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote an equitable and healthy future for families through services, advocacy, education, and collaboration.through collaboration with hospitals, educators, public health agencies, community-based organizations, consumers, and health care professionals, cjfhc: assists hospitals, community-based organizations, and professionals in providing access to maternal and infant healthcare and support services. Provides programs and services supporting maternal and infant health directly to consumers. Develops and distributes information about maternal health programs, initiatives, and legislature to professionals and consumers. Collects, interprets, and disseminates data through the vital information platform (vip).

What it reported doing in 2025

Grow nj kids is the quality rating improvement system for licensed early childhood programs in the state of New Jersey. Its goals include coordinating a rating system for centers, school districts, head start and home-based care that will assist families in understanding and seeking the best program for their infant, toddler and preschool age children. Another goal is to improve the quality of the workforce in early childhood programs. Since 2015 there are three regional technical assistance centers (tac) in grow nj kids who are funded to provide coaching, mentoring, classroom resources, classroom environment feedback, professional development and curriculum support in order to reach a quality rating. To date, many centers and child care providers around nj have reached a quality rating with the program's assistance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 89% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 95% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 68
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.4%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 98%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 95.8%; rating input score 96; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.73; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.4% of revenue deployed · 98% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 36 of 36 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $20.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $362K · 42 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.8M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 25 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 18 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.