Central Florida Behavioral Health Network, Inc.

Legal name: Central Florida Behavioral Health Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593467610
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Tampa, FL, United States
Phone
813.740.4811
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$304,199,504
Expenses
$304,211,093
Assets
$45,029,368
Liabilities
$43,074,145

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALAN DAVIDSON (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ALAN DAVIDSON (CEO): $280,326 total reported compensation
  • JULIE PATEL (CFO): $190,557 total reported compensation
  • KENT RUNYON (COO): $190,533 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

CFBHN develops and manages a behavioral health system of care in Florida’s SunCoast counties, contracting for a full continuum of publicly funded mental health and substance use services under eligibility guidelines. Vision and Shared Purpose About Central Florida Behavioral Health Network CFBHN is a not-for-profit 501(c)(3) corporation and a CARF International Accredited Services Management Network organization* contracting with community service organizations to provide a full array of publicly funded mental health and substance use services in the SunCoast counties of Charlotte, Collier, Desoto, Glades, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Hillsborough, Lee, Manatee, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk, and Sarasota. Services include acute care, residential treatment, housing, medical, outpatient, recovery support, and prevention.

What it reported doing in 2024

School projects: hillsborough & pasco county schoolsfollowing the tragedy at marjory stoneman douglas high school in february 2018, governor scott issued executive order 18-81. The order directs the local behavioral health managing entity to meet with local authorities, including the school districts, with the goals of improving communication, collaboration, and coordination of services. In addition to the executive order, the Florida state legislature passed the marjory stoneman douglas school public safety act that provided funding for the recommendations in the governor's major action plan. In implementing the recommendations set forth in the act, the hillsborough school district began meeting with cfbhn to find ways to use the additional funding to help meet the needs of students and the community who are falling through the gaps.the pasco county school system behavioral health program (pcssbhp) and the hillsborough county public school initiative program (hcpsmhip) assumed the current mou that the school board had with community providers and enhanced the expectation and accountability of the providers through creating subcontracts and vetting the providers into a network in september 2018. The hillsborough county public school district began receiving referrals from the district mental health clinicians as well.hillsborough county school program has implemented 126 on-site pairings with therapists. Pasco county has implemented three on-site pairings with therapists.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 100% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.8%; rating input score 98
  • Program expense ratio: 97.8%; rating input score 98
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.96; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 97.8% of revenue deployed · 97.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $297.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $280K · 19 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $865K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 89 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 85 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.