Center for Hospice Care Southeast Connecticut Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222667260
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019
- Location
- Norwich, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8608485699
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospices
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,709,067
- Expenses
- $1,582,981
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Charles L Johnson (President (Thru 6/30/20))
Highest reported compensation
- Charles L Johnson (President (Thru 6/30/20)): $1,287,503 total reported compensation
- Rocco Orlando MD (Secretary (Thru 6/30/20)): $1,168,242 total reported compensation
- Tracy Church (Chair (Thru 6/30/20)): $1,107,750 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide Health and Supportive Services to terminally ill individuals at their home or in a medical facility in Southeastern Connecticut.
What it reported doing in 2019
Hospice Home Care is a program designed to care for terminally ill patients through the use of the Interdisciplinary Team, which includes Nurses, HHA's, MSW's, Medical Director, Clergy, Therapists, Pharmacists, Trained Volunteers and Counselors. Care is provided in the person's place of residence, where ever that may be. Bereavement support is provided to the family for up to thirteen months after death.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 37
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 20%; rating input score 20
- Program expense ratio: 73.6%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.3%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 51.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 20% of revenue deployed · 73.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 8 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $187K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2010 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 65 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.