CCAPP Credentialing
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237261884
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9163389460
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,140,813
- Expenses
- $2,040,776
- Assets
- $2,380,187
- Liabilities
- $525,236
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Pete Nielsen (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Pete Nielsen (CEO): $187,498 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
CCAPP Credentialing's mission is to license and certify qualified addiction focused professionals towards attaining the highest professional standards.
What it reported doing in 2024
CCAPP Credentialing is California's largest certifying body within the State. In 2023 we continued to improve our processing times and we published them. We also created a new and improved streamlined transfer process as well as began the process of building new specialty credentials that aim to enhance diversity and cultural competence in our workforce. CCAPP Credentialing has worked hard to fill the gap our current workforce shortage has caused, bringing more opportunity to counselors and programs alike.For counselors looking to transfer, our new and improved Transfer Plus allows counselors to shed the burden of figuring out where they may fall on a new career ladder. As the workforce slowly recovers from its contractions as a result of COVID, the credentialing board aims to insulate our existing workforce from potential risks and improve our processes for all professionals.This year, we have also diversified our credential offerings. Through the Youth Opioid Response Round Three Grant, CCAPP will establish California's first youth SUD credential. As all are aware children are not adults and their needs in treatment and recovery are different from adults. In recognition of these differences, we hope that this credential, aimed at a specialization in youth services, will increase the competency and quality of SUD services for the youth.Other achievements include winning the Organizational Enhancement Support Grant to improve credentialing operations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Affiliate network. The nonprofit sent 72% of its reported program spending through affiliated organizations.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 79
- Accountability: 93
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.1%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $173.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.3%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.1% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $187K · 8 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.