Catherine Mcauley Health Services Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
382507173
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Ypsilanti, MI, USA
Phone
7347124500
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,882
Expenses
$14,621
Assets
$278,981
Liabilities
$2,900,284

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT CASALOU (DIRECTOR; PRES & CEO, MI REGION)
  • CYNTHIA ELLIOTT (PRESIDENT, TH MED GROUP MI)

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT CASALOU (DIRECTOR; PRES & CEO, MI REGION)
  • MICHAEL GUSHO (DIRECTOR; SEC/TREAS; CFO MI REGION)
  • MATTHEW MANN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide health care services

What it reported doing in 2024

Catherine mcauley health services corporation (cmhsc) was a member of trinity health medical group in ann arbor, Michigan. Cmhsc did business as the ann arbor spine center and as the Michigan brain and spine institute until june 2022. The operations were then transferred to a related nonprofit organization. Catherine mcauley health services corporation is now in the process of winding down.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 43.5%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.08; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 10.4; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 326 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.