Cascade Hemophilia Consortium

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383199649
IRS 990-PF coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025
Location
Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Phone
7349963300
Rating
53
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,569,819
Expenses
$16,830,915

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Cascade Hemophilia Consortium is a nonprofit. Location: Ann Arbor, MI. EIN 383199649. Tax year 2025 Form 990-PF reports $22.6M revenue and $16.8M expenses.

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 30 grants totaling $7,360,625. The stated grant purposes included support for medical services for persons with hemophilia and related bleeding disorders, lodging and meal support for famohio meeting, and support for springfest, nhf annual meeting, eagle expedition, and other regional core services, plus 10 other reported purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 89% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The foundation combined direct charitable work with grants to other organizations or people.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and the filing identifies who received its grants. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants and assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
  • Cost Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: 24

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: Limited

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 51.3%; rating input score 51; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Grants to individuals: Pass
    • Grants to organizations: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 12.63; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: Filed payout detail
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 24th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 38 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 24/100.