Northwest Ohio Hemophilia Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
340965673
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Toledo, OH, USA
Phone
4192915882
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$146,780
Expenses
$138,297
Assets
$33,135
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Carla Wells (Executive Director)
  • Paul Traver (President)

People named in this filing

  • Carla Wells (Executive Director)
  • Jim Knepp (Board Member)
  • Cindy Michael (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Northwest Ohio Hemophilia Foundation is a volunteer Non Profit organization. The foundation the foundation is a chapter of the national hemophilia foundation and has over a 30 year history of meeting the needs of individuals and families in Northwest Ohio impacted by bleeding disorders the foundation originally formed to meet the needs of individuals with hemophilia it scoped later expanded to include those with von Hildebrand disease and other coagulation diseases NWO HF provides a variety of services including family networking activities sending youth and adolescents to camp a family crisis fund and providing education programs and workshops

What it reported doing in 2025

Nwohf has served the general public including those with hemophilia and the families of those with hemophilia in the following manner: family and children activities provided in low risk atmospheres including camp, zoo day, baseball games, movies, family resource meetings; family annual meetings of hemophiliacs to promote the sharing of knowledge, experiences andconcerns among those individuals with hemophilia and related bleeding disorders; facilitating a youth leadership group; providing financial assistance for those with hemophilia in financial crisis; providing informative periodical newsletters; information dissemination including: information concerning treatment, prevention, diagnosis, email groups, support groups, personal stories and more.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.3%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 99%; rating input score 99

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.8%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 41.1%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.3% of revenue deployed · 99% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $137K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 17 filing years from 2009 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.