CAMC Teays Valley Hospital Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550752636
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2013
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Charleston, WV, US
Phone
(304) 388-5432
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$59,228,984
Expenses
$58,625,620
Assets
$42,492,681
Liabilities
$36,680,629

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • E Michael Robie DO (President of Medical Staff)
  • Leonard A Fichter DO (Past-President of Medical Staff)
  • Randall H Hodges (President)
  • Larry C Hudson (Vice President/Treasurer)

Highest reported compensation

  • David L Ramsey (Trustee): $1,743,415 total reported compensation
  • Larry C Hudson (Vice President/Treasurer): $661,289 total reported compensation
  • Dale R Wood start 113 (Trustee): $558,333 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We bring a full range of services – from primary care, to specialists who are leaders in their field – all focused on making health care better, safer and more accessible for everyone.

What it reported doing in 2013

Teays Valley Hospital provided un-reimbursed charity care at cost of $3,049,975 and bad debts at cost of $9,993,213 to the community in 2013 Teays Valley Hospital does much more than just provide health care, being involved in nearly every aspect of the lives and well-being of the community. Programs and services are available to our community to serve our community-particularly the needs of the low income, elderly, youth, and other vulnerable persons. Community benefits are programs or activities that provide treatment or promote health and healing as a response to identified community needs and meet at least one of the following community benefit criteria:1) Improves access to health care services.2) Enhances health of the community.3) Advances medical or health care knowledge.4) Relieves or reduces the burden of government or other community efforts. Teays benefit activities offered 20 programs which affected an estimated 13,938 people.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 75
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.4%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 75.1%; rating input score 75
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.86; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.6%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 74.4% of revenue deployed · 75.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $44M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.7M · 19 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $5.5M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes executive pay and related organizations
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.